Being a
pastor is never boring, but recent events here in Houston have made my line of work
especially interesting. Last week,
reports emerged that attorneys representing the city of Houston had subpoenaed,
as part of the discovery process for a lawsuit, the sermons of five Houston
pastors. Suddenly, I found myself at
ground zero of a serious debate over religious liberty, even though I wasn’t
one of the five. (Just to recap: This year the Houston City Council approved the Mayor’s
Equal Rights Ordinance, which would extend equal rights protections to gay and
transgender residents. A group opposing
the ordinance—mostly because of the provision that would allow men who self-identify
as female to use public women’s restrooms—gathered signatures on a petition
intended to force the issue to a vote in the November election. The Mayor’s office declared the petition
invalid. The group then sued. The Mayor’s attorneys subpoenaed all
communications, including sermons, related to the gathering of signatures from
five pastors who were key leaders in the opposition). Within a day of the first report, the mayor’s
office backtracked. They seemed
genuinely shocked by the reaction, and not just from the political right. To
cite merely one example of the non-partisan nature of the response: The Houston
Chronicle, which had endorsed the Ordinance, published an editorial denouncing
the subpoenas.
Since
then, I have read a lot of commentary, mostly from non-Houstonians, about this
event, what it says about our culture, and how Christians should respond. I’ve decided to add my own thoughts to that
cacophony of voices, as one Christian living in Houston. To me, there are two basic lessons we should
take from this.
It is
yet another sign we are living in a new world.
Some non-Christian observers have wondered why Christians were so
outraged by sermons being subpoenaed.
After all, the attorneys were clearly following established procedure in
a lawsuit, trying to find out what instructions were given by the organizers of
the petitions.
Besides, these days, most
pastors’s sermons are available online.
(This
is true: You don’t need a subpoena to learn what I have preached on sexuality, or
any other subject the Bible addresses.
Just go to
www.wbchouston.org).
The
reason for the outrage is that historically in our nation, government has
stayed away from any attempt to dictate what religious leaders can and cannot
say. When a pastor’s sermons can be used
against him in a lawsuit, that seems like a precedent-setting step toward
tearing down that wall of separation between church and state—one of the best
things about America.
By the way, I have met the Mayor. Last year, I was part of a small group of
leaders from Union Baptist Association who met with her to discuss an
initiative to help our city that we called Loving
Houston. She was cordial and
helpful, and instructed her staff to give us all the help we needed. She also was present for the launch of Loving Houston. I found her to be bright, cooperative, and genuinely
desiring the best for our city. On the
other hand, I understand she is a politician, and all politicians must satisfy
their political base. So these subpoenas were either: 1) An attempt to annoy,
embarrass and intimidate people whose religious views are unpopular with her
base. OR 2) A legal maneuver that turned
out to be a massive PR snafu for the Mayor and her office. Only the Mayor, her legal team, and God
Himself know which one is true.
What
bothered me more than the subpoenas were comments I read afterward on social
media, such as, “If these guys were preaching politics, their sermons are fair
game.” If I understand the law accurately,
that’s incorrect. The IRS stipulates
that a pastor or church may not endorse a political party or candidate without
endangering their church’s tax exempt status.
But we are free to preach on how the Bible speaks to issues in our
world. Should abolitionist preachers have
been free to use their pulpits to call slavery immoral? Was it wrong for Martin Luther King and other
civil rights leaders to stand in churches denouncing segregation? I read other comments that went further than
the legalities of this case, instead using this as an example of how organized
Christianity is toxic and hateful and should therefore be marginalized for the
good of society. There is nothing new about
such comments. But I am hearing—and
reading—them more and more often these days.
So when
I say we are living in a new world, this is what I mean: Christianity no longer
holds the cultural respect it once did.
To borrow an image from another writer, we have traditionally had the
wind at our backs as we tried to follow the commands of Christ and make a
difference in our society. Now the winds
have shifted. For the first time in
American history, the wind is in our face, and that wind is likely to get
fiercer. The good news is that we still
have it much easier than the first Christians, and they “turned the world
upside down” (Acts 17:6). Which brings
me to my other point…
We should always respond as
Christ would. In the past week, I
have read some eloquent, God-honoring statements from Christian leaders about
this issue.
This open letter from myfellow Houston pastor, Chris Seay, is my personal favorite. I’ve also seen letters, emails and social
media comments from professing Christians that made me deeply ashamed.
It’s obvious that the people in the latter
group are not interested in persuading anyone.
They don’t have Christ’s command to “love your neighbor” at heart.
They’re just rallying the troops, attacking
straw men, making a big noise.
Instead
of overcoming evil with good, they are being overcome by evil themselves
(Romans 12:21).
You
might say, “Jesus got angry at evil. He called people snakes and whitewashed
tombs. He flipped tables and chased
people out of the temple.” True, but
notice who was consistently the target of His anger: The religious leaders, who
should have known better. The hated Romans
would have been a much easier target.
After all, the Romans held religious and moral views (including on
sexuality) that would have been contemptible to Jesus. Plus, they were occupying His homeland. Jesus could have “played to His base” by attacking
Rome, and His popularity would have soared. But Jesus never criticized the
Gentiles. In fact, His final instructions to His followers were to take His saving
love to those same idolatrous, amoral outsiders. A guy named Saul, formerly a hyper-religious,
conspicuously moral Pharisee, took those instructions more seriously than
anyone. Others followed in his
footsteps. That’s how our world was
changed. From its start, Christianity
set people free NOT by attacking them for not measuring up, but by loving them
genuinely, while living in a consistently compelling, utterly distinct way. If they could see us today, I suspect they
would wonder why we waste our time getting angry at people who don’t know our
God…for acting like people who don’t know our God.
So here
is my hope and prayer: That we would live out our faith, preaching the whole
counsel of God’s Word (including the unpopular parts)…and, that in doing so, we would show an uncommon, counter-cultural
love for those who oppose us. I pray
that we would get our marching orders from Jesus Christ, not from people on TV,
radio and social media whose ratings, blog hits and fundraising efforts depend on
stirring up controversy, inflaming serious situations into catastrophes.
Speaking
of which, one pundit was trying to convince every Houston pastor to preach
about the subpoenas this past Sunday, and then send copies of our sermons to
the Mayor’s office. Before any of this
hit, I was planning to preach on grace this past Sunday. I decided to stick with grace. I may not know much, but I believe that’s
always a good choice.